Chuck Darwin<p>Last spring, then–presidential nominee Donald Trump asked the Supreme Court to grant him <a href="https://c.im/tags/criminal" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>criminal</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/immunity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>immunity</span></a> for all his official acts while he was in the White House. <br>Ignoring the ominous warnings of the Democratic-appointed justices, <br>Chief Justice John Roberts and all the other Republican appointees agreed. <br>On July 1, 2024, former presidents became immune from prosecution for essentially all official acts of the job of president. <br>The only check is if the justices themselves decide a particular act is prosecutable.<br>In his majority opinion, Roberts justified his grant of criminal immunity as rooted in <br>the framers’ desire for a “vigorous” and “energetic” executive who shall have “‘the maximum ability to deal fearlessly and impartially with’ the duties of his office.” <br>For historians, this is bunk. <br>“While the Founders had a range of ideas about the scope of executive power, none of those ideas included
conferring immunity on the President in the circumstances
at issue here,” <br>scholars of the country’s founding wrote in an amicus brief that Roberts ignored. <br>“Petitioner’s argument to the contrary is not historically credible.” <br>As presidential historian and executive director of the George Washington Presidential Library Lindsay Chervinsky told me, of Roberts’ immunity ruling, <br>“historically, it has zero basis</p><p>💥So now, in the first weeks of President Trump’s second term, we are witnessing a <br>“vigorous” and “energetic” executive <br>and his minions who have been given license to ❌ remake the government without bothering to follow the law.</p><p>Trump is firing civil servants, independent agency commissioners, and inspectors general, <br>-- despite laws to the contrary. </p><p>His administration has attempted to illegally halt billions in federal aid payments, <br>in contravention of Congress’ power of the purse. </p><p>And he has empowered Elon Musk, <br>a billionaire whose business empire is tied to federal government contracts and investigations, <br>to gut the civil service, <br>access the country’s sensitive payment systems, and, in so doing, <br>jeopardize the most private personal information of millions of Americans. </p><p>It appears to be, as former US Attorney Joyce Vance described the situation, <br>“a coup—a takeover of government by a self-appointed group that wasn’t duly elected by the American people.” </p><p>Though Trump has blessed Musk’s efforts, he has no authority to do so.<br><a href="https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/02/what-justice-jackson-warned-about-in-the-trump-immunity-case-is-coming-true/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">motherjones.com/politics/2025/</span><span class="invisible">02/what-justice-jackson-warned-about-in-the-trump-immunity-case-is-coming-true/</span></a></p>